I read this great article about a year ago, by a woman who works in Paris as a professional 'nose' for one of the big perfume houses.
A nose, I gather, is someone with an extraordinarily fine sense of smell who is employed by the perfumery for their skill and astute judgement in assessing fragrance - just the way that some people have very fine palates for wine.
I don't think it's so much a case of being a 'perfume freak' in case you're imagining some OTT Sex and the City-wannabe tripping around Paris overloading on perfumes and high heels. This woman seemed more to be a freak of nature, in that she was unbelievably attuned to scents and their connection to memory and emotion.
What stayed with me was her argument that society is suffering from a (fake) scent overload (a somewhat contradictory stance, given her job). She made a very convincing case against over-scenting, saying that she has little interest in her kids being exposed to lavender-scented toilet bowl cleanser and air deodoriser that smells like pine.
Instead, she said, she wanted them to know what the smell of a mouldy cupbard is like and what books smell of after they're stored and what smelling fresh-mown grass makes one feel.
I really liked that idea - the notion that particular, ordinary scents are worth educating ourselves in, and that all scents have value, purpose and meaning even if they're not the smells you think of as 'important' or 'beautiful'.
Recent Comments